Emancipated – “Lincoln” Review

With Lincoln, Daniel Day-Lewis has topped himself again. It seems unfair that he is this good. Day-Lewis encompasses the role of the revered 16th President of the United States in every conceivable way. It is a performance certain to be discussed for a long time. The movie is pretty great too.

Lincoln focuses on the recently re-elected President’s struggle, in the midst of the Civil War, with a divided House of Representatives, to pass the Thirteenth Amendment, abolishing slavery. It is impossible to watch this movie after the recent election without considering Obama and the “do-nothing” Congress. But these connections are not lingered upon. The film is more interested in the man.

Day-Lewis uses his physicality to present not just the legend, but the exhausted man behind the legend. He uses his voice, pitched up but still tempered, both to command a crowd and softly lay out his thoughts. It is a tool, the same as it was for the real Lincoln. In some of his most powerful scenes, Day-Lewis merely listens. Taking it all in, his eyes convey his contemplation, his buried emotion, and when he responds it feels genuine, like a great mind sharing his reasoning.

And apparently, Lincoln liked to talk, at great length. At one point, a character laments that the President is about to launch into another one of his stories. Lincoln is full of anecdotes and funny jokes, but he’s really thinking out loud. It’s his process, how he searched for the truth. The film has a love of words, and the way it is written, you begin to love them too.

All of this talking, the arcane language, rhythms, and personality require some acclimating, but I have enjoyed movies of late that require the viewer to tap into their wavelength and this is no different. There’s no need to bone up on your history, since the film delicately lays out each character’s position and significance. What might slow you down is the barrage of great actors popping up every other minute. From the well-known, like Joseph Gordon-Levitt, to many, many “hey, that guy,” the film is stacked with talent. It’s a parade of awesome facial hair and accents. Other than Day-Lewis, Tommy Lee Jones and James Spader are the MVPs. As Thaddeus Stevens, Jones goes past playing generic, “cranky old guy” and becomes the soul of the picture. It’s subtle, but some of his best work. Spader is the comic relief, and he damn near upends the whole thing. It’s not what the other guys are doing, but it makes it no less joyous.

A few minor bits play awkwardly, like leftovers from the overreaching from Amistad. Sally Field is solid as Mary Todd. But it wasn’t immediately clear what purpose she served in the story, eventually she is a part of a highlight scene. Still, of all the characters, I could have used less of her. There’s so much that works that I don’t want to mention the atrocious ending, but somebody has to. It doesn’t ruin the movie, but there’s a perfect image and stopping point in Lincoln, then the film keeps on going for 3 more painfully unnecessary minutes.

Steven Spielberg, re-teaming with his Munich writer Tony Kushner, goes for a mannered approach. The cinematography and John Williams’ pleasant score are subdued. It’s like Spielberg doesn’t want anything taking the focus away from the subject, which is a smart choice. The movie places Abraham Lincoln on a pedestal to deconstruct him, to separate the myth from the man. Acknowledging the genius as that of a man haunted by many things. His patience informs his wisdom. By showing us his flawed human nature, that he didn’t always have the answer and had to find his way to it, the movie makes an already revered figure seem even greater.

Advertisements

6 responses to “Emancipated – “Lincoln” Review

  1. I agree about the ending. I wouldn’t call it atrocious but it definitely didn’t need to go there.

  2. Loved this film, and Day Lewis is one of the greatest actors of all time period. I think the fact that he has never felt the need to take on every pay day to come along has really lent itself to his development of the craft of acting. I was surprised by the limited scope of the films topic but then surprised by the nuances delivered about that event. As for the ending, if I am remembering correctly about the ending I would argue that it did belong in the film, just not as its final scene as from what I have read it is historically accurate and does lend an understanding to the devotion to the fight of this character… unfortunately the film was not named for that character but for Lincoln.

    • I’m talking about when he walks away to go to the theater. It should have ended there. No need to have the rest. The Tommy Lee Jones thing was great.

  3. Oh, OK, I couldn’t quite recollect the exact ending events. You are talking about post theater. I got ya. One of the few moments in the film that I hated was the bogus knowing and prescient glance by his butler (Or whatever his role was) after the gloves thing, as though he could somehow sense something… I thought that was a poor choice and dulled that walking away moment for me.

    But LOVED this film.

  4. Pingback: 2013 Oscar Checklist – The Master List | Shooting the Script

  5. Pingback: Bryan’s Top Ten Movies of 2012 | Shooting the Script

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s