“Mission:Impossible – Ghost Protocol” Review

[Editor’s note: This review was finished while the movie was still in theaters, but it got lost in the fray. So, all the IMAX talk probably doesn’t mean much to you now, but it’s still a fun movie.]

You might have seen the footage of mega-star Tom Cruise climbing the outside of the tallest building in the world, the Burj Khalifa. Or you’ve seen any bit of marketing that has the Burj front and center. But nothing can prepare you for the awesomeness of the final product on a real IMAX screen. It’s a show-stopping moment, skillfully executed and it takes a funny fast-paced action movie and turns it into a must-see event of the highest order.

Ghost Protocol begins with super-spy Ethan Hunt locked away in a Russian prison. There’s a very comical escape sequence before the world saving plot shifts into high gear. It seems some Russian bad guy is about to get his hands on nuclear secrets and he is crazy adamant about causing global annihilation. That might sound heavy, but it isn’t meant to have any real world crossover. It’s simply an excuse to throw our heroes into extreme circumstances. Some films might try to comment on politics or use a bit of metaphor, but this film is solely focused on entertaining the hell out of you, a job it does very well.

Cruise and his elite team, Paula Patton, Simon Pegg, and Jeremy Renner, hop from country to country trying to save the world. It’s not the most unique set-up, and I wasn’t always sure exactly what was happening from scene to scene. However, director Brad Bird (The Incredibles, Ratatouille) fills out the thin plot with so many great sequences that you can hardly be bothered to care about the details.

And then there’s the IMAX. Cinematographer Robert Elswit (There Will Be Blood) shoots the major action like he’s conducting a symphony, only he’s using a bulky, noisy camera to do it. At the end of each IMAX scene you’ll feel like applauding. In fact, my audience did, right after the already classic Dubai sequence. The sound design, especially during “the scene,” is some of the best of the year, even more ear-splitting in an IMAX theater.

There’s a subplot involving Jeremy Renner that wasn’t terrible but felt very unnecessary. Sometimes modern films feel a need to explain everything a little too much. I also didn’t care for the sentimental final moments. They felt a little deep for a film that takes pride in its brevity. The villain wasn’t anything special either. Not only is he bland, but the casting is a tad lazy. Michael Nyqvist was most recently a bland Euro-villain in the Taylor Lautner turd Abduction and Hollywood seems to think international stars can only be villains in big budget action films.

Those are small flaws in a very exciting and exceedingly intelligent action film. If you’re looking for something to watch while eating popcorn, then look no further.

Grade: A-

Advertisements

3 responses to ““Mission:Impossible – Ghost Protocol” Review

  1. Everyone I’ve talked to have made jabs about the villain.
    However, if you think back to the show there were never fully fleshed out bad guys. It was always “this russian guy in a suit is bad and has this thing that he shouldn’t”. The focus of this film and the show were the mission itself. The missions were never to kill somebody. Assassinations are easy, these missions were impossible. Giving us everything we need to know about his guy in a 30 second clip is gutsy and faithful to the source material.

    What do you remember about the bad guy from MI3 other than he was played by Phillip Seymore Hoffman?

  2. You make a good point, but then I’d say why even see the villain. They could be chasing the codename, you don’t need those scenes with him.

    My main problem with him though isn’t that he isn’t some all-time badass, but the fact that he’s a cog in the Hollywood foreign actor recycling machine. They could have given him some vague sense of character. which maybe they did but they cut out. I keep hearing about extra exposition that was cut, for good reason, and maybe a sub-plot that was cut. how else to explain him wearing that mask for no reason?

  3. Never understood why he had to have a mask, in fact it was confusing, the sub plots were distracting, but the end scene was very good and fairly original.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s